« Update on Patent Wars: Worlds.com Picks a Fight | Main | New Paper on UGC »

Dec 30, 2008

Comments

1.

ß âàì î÷åíü áëàãîäàðåí, ìíå ïîíðàâèëîñü.

2.

Corporations should not be allowed to protect any ip at all. That is, unless we say its ok.

3.

"Corporations should not be allowed to protect any ip at all. That is, unless we say its ok."

I actually agree, but we don't set the example well, when we embed the notion of IP into the very fabrics of our universe.

I suspect a few people have considered me a bit of a troublemaker , or god forbid, goon troll, on this point, but I genuinely despise the Second Life model of intellectual property mostly because Second life has become the standard bearer thats other worlds will be judged on.

Now by my reckoning, virtual reality holds the promise of total freedom. That is final , unlimited, anti-authoritarian freedom, if we let it. And by freedom, I mean it with a black flag.

So chaining a monetary and intellectual property system to that promise seems like a cruel hijack of a liberty potential with one of the most un-liberating aspects of the real world, capital..

Anyway, rant rant...

Folks should have a read of Richard Stallmans "Right to Read", if they get a few spare mins. I actually think Stallman is one of the best layman liberal thinkers of our time for his interesting take on intellectual freedom and the solution GPL as a sort of social contract.

The comments to this entry are closed.