First, a chance of 15 minutes of fame - for some of you.
Granada TV here in the UK just phoned me about a short series called Game Stars they’re going to make. It’s basically an awards show, one of the aims of which is to find "the UK’s best computer gamer". The result will be a number of programmes that will be shown over the course of several evenings. They ran a pilot last year, and had 10,000 people turn up at the ExCel centre in London to take part.
Well, actually they had 10,000 male people aged between 16 and 25.
Granada are aware that the words "computer games" and "competition" aren’t female-friendly, and that they can therefore once again expect that those attending their event will not reflect the true make-up of computer gamers across the UK. They are keen to redress this imbalance by, in the narrative part of the programmes, showing pictures of (among others) women gamers playing games in real life. Hopefully, this will go some way to erasing the impression they would otherwise give that computer games are the sole preserve of enthusiastic spods yet to discover the meaning of the word “shampoo”.
Unfortunately, the people at Granada don't know any female gamers.
So, if you’re a female computer games player in the UK over the age of 25 who is prepared to be filmed playing a game at which you are skilled (and this includes virtual worlds), Granada would like to hear from you. More specifically, Yeva Paley of Game Stars, would like to hear from you: her email is [email protected] (you can mention my name if you like).
As the Terra Nova angle on this, is this kind of "balancing" a good idea or simply patronising? Is there any way to find "best gamers" that might persuade women and the over-25s to come out of the woodwork? And if there were an award for "best player of a virtual world", what criteria could be used to determine a winner?
Recent Comments