« Back to Ontology | Main | GDC Online Coverage »

Oct 05, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c022953ef015435ea5610970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Minecraft as Web 2.0:

Comments

1.

Loved the chapter. Really nice work. I'm a librarian interested in copyright law and Web 2.0 applications, an Art Appreciation instructor interested in creativity, and a long-time gamer, including, currently, Minecraft. Sweet fit ;)

2.

Great chapter. I'm going to forward this.

3.

Amber & Leonel -- thanks so much for the comments! I'm really happy you liked it.

4.

I can give three major reasons why Minecraft has been so popular where second life feels like a failed idea:

1) Nobody wants real life money intruding on their game play. Second life became distinctly unfun when it started to become about money and not making stuff. It might have interested academics and business people, but gamers have been very vocal on this: Games are about escaping. When games become a job, they stop being a game. Thus the militancy gamers have about going after gold-farmers in games. Seriously guys, I know academics are fascinated by it, but RMT and microtransactions will never make for fun gameplay. Second life tried to remove the gameplay out of gamesand put in money instead, and as a result its become a distinctly un-entertaining place to go to.

2) Minecrafts building is easy and a game. The block interface trades complexity for fun. Sure you cant make as good looking stuff in minecraft as you can in second life, but what you can make is pretty easy to make, and with a bit of creativity you can make what you want without the artistic talent making it in second life requires. Thats a great leveller. If you CANT make a *realistic* castle, you also dont need the talent to make a realistic castle. But minecrafts creativity isn't free. It *does* require labor, but its fun labor. To make a railway, you need railways tracks. To get railway tracks for your train you either grind iron and trees, or you enter a disused mine , fight spiders and hack out the railway pieces. Thats *fun*, but its not free. Converting your wages into Lindens to hire some guy to make you a railway and train just isn't fun at all.

3) Its a game and doesn't pretend to be anything else. Sure you COULD have a conference on a minecraft server, but you might also get your CEO sploded by a creeper too. Its not for that! Its for having a bucket load of fun hacking up creepers, exploring caves and building increasingly ludicrous castles and contraptions.

Minecraft would DEFINATELY make a great MMO by the way. I would definately spend time in that. But I don't even know if its necessary. Minecraft servers are not MMO social , but they are social enough, in some respect, and with a big one that can have 64 people at a time, theres plenty of oportunities to socialize with others.

5.

Hi Shayne --

Yes, I agree -- good points!

6.

Virtual working environment using state-of-the-art technology, many companies today are indeed expanding their business operations with collaborated technology tools to virtually improve numbers in terms of workforce efficiency, minimizing traveling expenditures and most importantly lower infrastructure investments.

http://conferencediary.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/virtual-work-environment/

7.

Shayne makes some very great points about the popularity of Minecraft and I would tend to agree with all of them. In his second point he states that creativity in Minecraft in simple and to the point. It does not allow for complex creations but allows for some pretty impressive creations nonetheless.

Simplicity to me, is the driving point to Minecraft's success, not necessarily the lack of gameplay elements. Thus it would seem to me that allowing for things such as code modding and complex interactions would actually hurt Minecraft in the long run.

The comments to this entry are closed.